Refine your search

Keyword:

Grounds:

Show more

Year:

Country:

Show more

Article(s):

Show more

Order:

Show more

Requesting State:

Show more

Requested State:

Show more

Court Level:

Show more

Instrument:

Search results (1563)

  • 2017 | HC/E/JP 1390 | JAPAN | Appellate Court
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 4 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b)

    Synopsis

    1 child wrongfully retained in Japan ― National of Singapore and Japan ― Married parents ― Father national of Singapore – Mother national of Japan ― Child lived in Singapore until 2016 ― Application for return filed with the Central Authority of Singapore in 2016 ― Petition for return filed with the courts of Japan in 2017 ― Return ordered ― Main issues: acquiescence and Art. 13(1)(b) grave risk exception to return – There is no grave risk in ordering the return of the child in cases involving domestic violence between the parents where a protection order is in place in the requesting State and where there is no evidence that any violence has been committed against the child ― It cannot be said that a parent has not actually exercised rights of custody at the time of removal if he did not know the whereabouts of the child at that time  ― A parent has not approved of or acquiesced in the retention if he filed a return application with the Central Authority of the requesting State about one month after coming to know of the removal, and with the courts of the requested State almost one year after the removal, respectively.

  • 2013 | HC/E/US 1264 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | First Instance |
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2)

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b) 13(2) 12(2)

    Ruling

    Removal wrongful but return refused; more than 12 months had elapsed prior to the filing of the return petition and the children were held to be settled in their new environment; the older child also had valid objections to returning.

  • 1997 | HC/E/US 1143 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | First Instance |
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Consent - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Issues Relating to Return

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Removal wrongful but return refused; Article 13(1)(a) and Article 13(1)(b) had both been proved to the standard required under the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention.

  • 2000 | HC/E/NL 317 | NETHERLANDS - KINGDOM IN EUROPE
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | ES
    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return order allowed to stand; the retention was wrongful and none of the Article 13 exceptions had been proved.

  • 2025 | HC/E/UKe 1650 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | Appellate Court
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2)

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return refused

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b) 12(2)

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed. Order for return to Portugal set aside. 

  • 2025 | HC/E/UKe 1659 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Return refused. Though the mother was indeed wrongfully retaining the child, by the time the father made an application for return the child was settled in England and habitually resident there. 

  • 2025 | HC/E/US 1649 | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | First Instance
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Human Rights - Art. 20 | Consent - Art. 13(1)(a)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Return ordered.

  • 2025 | HC/E/UKe 1658 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b) 12(2)

    Ruling

    Return refused. 

  • 2025 | HC/E/UKe 1644 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Issues Relating to Return

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Return refused, there was a grave risk of harm to the child if returned to Australia, within the meaning of Article 13(1)(b). The undertakings and protective measures offered by the father did not adequately protect the child against the identified risks.

  • 2011 | HC/E/UKs 1153 | UNITED KINGDOM - SCOTLAND | First Instance |
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Consent - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Brussels IIa Regulation (Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003)

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    3 4 11 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 14 16 17 18 19

    Ruling

    Removal wrongful but return refused; Article 13(2) had been proved to the standard required under the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention.

  • 2012 | HC/E/BE 1171 | European Court of Human Rights (ECrtHR) |
    Languages
    Full text download FR
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) | Procedural Matters

    Article(s)

    13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 13(3) 26

    Ruling

    By five votes to two: infringement of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR); award of damages on the basis of Article 41 of the ECHR.

  • 2010 | HC/E/UKe 1042 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Human Rights - Art. 20

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b) 13(2) 20

    Ruling

    Removal wrongful but return refused; Article 13(1)(b) had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 2008 | HC/E/USf 971 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | Appellate Court |
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Undertakings | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Human Rights - Art. 20

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b) 13(2) 20

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the removal was wrongful and none of the exceptions had been established to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 2009 | HC/E/FR 1031 | FRANCE | Appellate Court
    Languages
    Full text download FR
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    1 3 13(1)(b) 13(2) 26

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed; the retention was wrongful and the grounds for exception under the Convention were not applicable.

  • 2008 | HC/E/USf 972 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | Appellate Court |
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, application dismissed

    Article(s)

    3

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and application dismissed; there was no retention of the child.

  • 2007 | HC/E/UKe 973 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Consent - Art. 13(1)(a)

    Order

    Application dismissed

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(a)

    Ruling

    Application dismissed; the child was not habitually resident in the United States.

  • 2010 | HC/E/USf 1025 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | Appellate Court |
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, application dismissed

    Article(s)

    3

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and application dismissed; the children were habitually resident in the United States of America at the date of the alleged wrongful retention.

  • 2020 | HC/E/DE 1491 | GERMANY
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    The mother’s complaint appeal (Beschwerde) was rejected and the order for return was maintained with the specification that the child was to be returned to Spain but not necessarily to Madrid.

  • 2009 | HC/E/CA 1112 | CANADA | First Instance |
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Consent - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 5 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 16

    Ruling

    Removal wrongful and return ordered, with the father ordered to pay the costs of return; the child was habitually resident in Turkey at the time of her removal and none of the exceptions had been established to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 1998 | HC/E/DE 820 | GERMANY | Appellate Court |
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the retention was wrongful and the child's objections were rejected as she was not sufficiently mature and had been unduly influenced by her mother.