Refine your search

Keyword:

Grounds:

Show more

Year:

Country:

Show more

Article(s):

Show more

Order:

Show more

Requesting State:

Show more

Requested State:

Show more

Court Level:

Show more

Instrument:

Search results (753)

  • 1999 | HC/E/IE 272 | IRELAND | Superior Appellate Court |
    T.M.M. v. M.D. [Child Abduction: Article 13) [2000] 1 IR 149
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return refused

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b) 13(2) 13(3)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed, removal wrongful but return refused; the standard of harm required under Article 13(1)(b) had been made out.

  • 2000 | HC/E/AU 275 | AUSTRALIA | Appellate Court |
    The Director-General, Department of Families, Youth and Community Care v. Rhonda May Bennett [2000] FamCA 253, (2000) FLC 93-011, 26 Fam LR 71
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Human Rights - Art. 20

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b) 20

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed, retention wrongful and return ordered within 21 days; neither Article 13(1)(b) nor Article 20 had been proved to the standard required.

  • 1997 | HC/E/AU 212 | AUSTRALIA | First Instance |
    Director-General, Department of Families, Youth and Community Care v. Thorpe (1997) FLC 92-785, [1997] FamCA 45
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2)

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    1 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 12(1)

    Ruling

    Retention wrongful but return refused; the child was settled in his new environment in terms of Article 12(2); the mother had acquiesced in the retention in terms of Article 13(1)(a); and the child objected to being returned and had attained an age and degree of maturity at which it was appropriate to take account of his views in terms of Article 13(2).

  • 1994 | HC/E/IL 215 | ISRAEL | First Instance |
    L. v. L., 26 June 1994, transcript (Unofficial Translation) Tel Aviv District Court
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 17 19

    Ruling

    Removal wrongful and return ordered; the children were habitually resident in the United States at the relevant date, and the standard required under Articles 13(1)(a) and 13(1)(b) had not been met.

  • 1999 | HC/E/USs 218 | UNITED STATES - STATE JURISDICTION | First Instance |
    Dimer v. Dimer, No. 99-2-03610-7SEA (Wash. Super. Ct July 29, 1999)
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    3 5 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Removal wrongful but return refused; the standard had been met under Article 13(1)(a) to show that the father had acquiesced in the removal and under Article 13(1)(b) to show that the children would face a grave risk of harm if returned.

  • 1998 | HC/E/CNh 234 | CHINA (HONG KONG, SAR) | First Instance |
    S. v. S. [1998] 2 HKC 316
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Undertakings | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Return ordered with undertakings offered

    Article(s)

    3 4 11 12 13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Return ordered and undertakings offered; the removal was wrongful and the standard required under Article 13(1)(b) to indicate that the child would face a grave risk of physical harm had not been met.

  • 1994 | HC/E/CA 11 | CANADA | Superior Appellate Court |
    Thomson v. Thomson [1994] 3 SCR 551, 6 RFL (4th) 290
    Languages
    Full text download EN | FR
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Undertakings | Interpretation of the Convention

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    1 3 5 11 12 13(1)(b) 15 16

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered forthwith subject to undertakings. The child had been wrongfully removed and none of the exceptions applied.

  • 1996 | HC/E/CA 17 | CANADA | Superior Appellate Court |
    W.(V.) v. S.(D.), (1996) 2 SCR 108, (1996) 134 DLR 4th 481
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Procedural Matters | Interpretation of the Convention

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    1 3 5 11 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 21 13(3)

    Ruling

    The court found that the Convention was not applicable to the case but dismissed the appeal on the basis that the child's interests were best served by a return to the United States.

  • 2000 | HC/E/UKs 341 | UNITED KINGDOM - SCOTLAND | First Instance |
    Q., Petitioner [2001] SLT 243
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Removal was wrongful, but return refused, the standard of harm required under Article 13(1)(b) had been met.

  • 2001 | HC/E/AU 345 | AUSTRALIA | First Instance |
    Barry Eldon Matthews (Commissioner, Western Australia Police Service) v. Ziba Sabaghian PT 1767 of 2001
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Return ordered; matter was stood down to allow the mother to reconsider whether she would return to Germany with the child.

  • 2001 | HC/E/AU 347 | AUSTRALIA | Superior Appellate Court |
    DP v. Commonwealth Central Authority; JLM v. Director-General NSW Department of Community Services [2001] HCA 39, (2001) 180 ALR 402
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Undertakings

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return refused

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    The High Court allowed the appeal in both cases. The cases were remitted to the Full Court of the Family Court for further consideration consistent with the reasons for judgment of the High Court.

  • 1999 | HC/E/USs 320 | UNITED STATES - STATE JURISDICTION | Appellate Court |
    Janakakis-Kostun v. Janakakis, 6 S.W.3d 843 (Ky. Ct. App. 1999), pet. for cert. filed, 68 U.S.L.W. 3598 (Mar. 8, 2000)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Human Rights - Art. 20

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 5 13(1)(b) 20

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the removal was wrongful as it was in breach of the father's rights of custody and the child was habitually resident in Greece at the relevant date.

  • 1998 | HC/E/DE 325 | GERMANY | First Instance |
    93 F 178/98 HK, Familiengericht Flensburg (Family Court), 18 September 1998
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the removal was wrongful and neither Article 13(1)(b) nor Article 13(2) had been proved to the standard required by the Convention.

  • 2000 | HC/E/USf 326 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | Appellate Court |
    Walsh v. Walsh, No. 99-1747 (1st Cir. July 25, 2000)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Undertakings | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return refused

    Article(s)

    12 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Appeal of the mother allowed; removal wrongful but return refused; the standard required under Article 13(1)(b) had been met. The court found that a high probability existed that the father would violate the undertakings he had given and, as a consequence, the children would remain at grave risk if returned.

  • 1998 | HC/E/HU 329 | HUNGARY | Appellate Court |
    Mezei v. Bíró 23.P.500023/98/5. (27. 03. 1998, Central District Court of Budapest; First Instance); 50.Pkf.23.732/1998/2. 16. 06. 1998., (Capital Court as Appellate Court)
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed and return ordered; the retention was wrongful as the children were habitually resident in Australia at the relevant date. The standard of harm required under Article 13(1)(b) had not been met.

  • 1999 | HC/E/CH 442 | SWITZERLAND | First Instance |
    Tribunal civil de l'arrondissement de la Sarine (Civil Court of the Sarine District), 17 May 1999, TR 132/1999
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    1 2 3 5 11 12 13(1)(b) 13(2) 19 26

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the removal was wrongful and Article 13(1)(b) was not proved to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 2002 | HC/E/USf 459 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | Appellate Court |
    Danaipour v. McLarey, 286 F.3d 1 (1st Cir.2002)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Undertakings | Interpretation of the Convention

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed and case remitted to the trial court to determine whether sexual abuse of the children had occurred and whether the children would consequently be at a grave risk of physical or psychological harm or of otherwise being placed in an intolerable situation if returned.

  • 1998 | HC/E/AU 291 | AUSTRALIA | Appellate Court |
    Director-General, Department of Community Services v. M. and C. and the Child Representative (1998) FLC 92-829; (1998) 24 Fam LR 178, [1998] FamCA 1518
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return refused

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b) 13(2) 12(2)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed. Retention wrongful but return refused; the standard required under Article 12(2) had been reached to show the children were settled in their new environment.

  • 1999 | HC/E/IT 297 | ITALY | First Instance |
    R. and R., 7 January 1999, Juvenile Court of Rome
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b) 13(2) 16

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the removal was wrongful as the child was habitually resident in England at the relevant date.

  • 1993 | HC/E/FR 298 | FRANCE | First Instance |
    TGI Abbeville, 6 octobre 1993, W. v. G.
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    12 13(1)(b) 16

    Ruling

    Return refused; the removal was wrongful but the standard required under Article 13(1)(b) to indicate a grave risk of physical and psychological harm had been met.