Refine your search

Keyword:

Grounds:

Show more

Year:

Country:

Show more

Article(s):

Show more

Order:

Show more

Requesting State:

Show more

Requested State:

Show more

Court Level:

Show more

Instrument:

Search results (762)

  • 1988 | HC/E/UKe 121 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | Appellate Court |
    Re E. (A Minor) (Abduction) [1989] 1 FLR 135
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    7 13(1)(b) 13(3)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the standard required under Article 13(1)(b) had not been met.

  • 1996 | HC/E/UKs 77 | UNITED KINGDOM - SCOTLAND | First Instance |
    Cameron v. Cameron (No. 2) 1997 SLT 206
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Undertakings | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return ordered with undertakings offered

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the standard required under Articles 13(1)(b) and 13(2) had not been met.

  • 1989 | HC/E/UKe 95 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | Appellate Court |
    Re G. (A Minor) (Abduction) [1989] 2 FLR 475
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Undertakings | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered subject to undertakings

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b) 13(2) 12(2)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered subject to undertakings; the standard required under Article 13(1)(b) to indicate that the child would face a grave risk of psychological harm had not been met.

  • 1997 | HC/E/USs 97 | UNITED STATES - STATE JURISDICTION | First Instance |
    Panazatou v. Pantazatos, No. FA 960713571S (Conn. Super. Ct. Sept. 24, 1997)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Undertakings

    Order

    Return ordered subject to undertakings

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Return ordered subject to undertakings; the standard required under Article 13(1)(b) to indicate that the child would face a grave risk of psychological harm had not been met.

  • 1996 | HC/E/UKe 18 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
    Re H.B. (Abduction: Children's Objections) [1997] 1 FLR 392
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Consent - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Return ordered; while the boy's objections to a return were valid and should be taken into account, the girl's were not and it was held that they should not be separated.

  • 1992 | HC/E/UKs 28 | UNITED KINGDOM - SCOTLAND | Appellate Court |
    Whitley v. Whitley 1992 GWD 22-1248
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 11 12 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return of the children to the United States ordered; the evidence did not support a finding of a grave risk of harm pursuant to Article 13(1)(b).

  • 1995 | HC/E/NZ 67 | NEW ZEALAND | First Instance |
    Secretary for Justice v. Penney, ex parte Calabro [1995] NZFLR 827
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Return refused; the removal was wrongful but the standard required under Article 13(2) had been made out with respect to the two older children, while the standard required under Article 13(1)(b) had been made out with respect to the youngest child.

  • 1997 | HC/E/UKe 39 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
    Re B. (Abduction: Children's Objections) [1998] 1 FLR 667
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Removal wrongful but return refused on the basis of the children's objections.

  • 1996 | HC/E/UKe 86 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | Appellate Court |
    Re M. (Abduction: Psychological Harm) [1997] 2 FLR 690
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return refused

    Article(s)

    1 3 12 13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return refused; the standard required under Article 13(1)(b) to indicate the children would face a grave risk of psychological harm had been met.

  • 1997 | HC/E/CA 13 | CANADA | Appellate Court |
    Hoskins v. Boyd, (1997) 28 RFL (4th) 221
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Undertakings

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the standard required under Article 13(1)(b) to indicate that the child would face a grave risk of psychological harm had not been met.

  • 1989 | HC/E/CA 16 | CANADA | First Instance |
    Parsons v. Styger (1989), 67 O.R. (2d) 1 (L.J.S.C.), aff'd (1989) 67 O.R. (2d) 11 (C.A.)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Human Rights - Art. 20

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    1 2 3 4 12 13(1)(b) 14

    Ruling

    Application allowed; counter-application dismissed. The child was ordered to be returned forthwith to California.

    If the mother accompanied the child, he would remain in her temporary custody in Los Angeles County with reasonable access to the father, pending any other interim or permanent order of a California court having jurisdiction.

  • 1996 | HC/E/UKe 181 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
    Re S. (A Minor), 20 August 1996, High Court, transcript; The Independent, 14 October 1996
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the children were habitually resident in Canada at the relevant date.

  • 1994 | HC/E/UKs 187 | UNITED KINGDOM - SCOTLAND | First Instance |
    Matznick v. Matznick 1994 GWD 39-2277
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Undertakings | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return ordered with undertakings offered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Return ordered; in the light of the father's undertakings the standard required under Article 13(1)(b) to indicate that the children would face a grave risk of physical harm had not been met.

  • 1994 | HC/E/USs 138 | UNITED STATES - STATE JURISDICTION | Appellate Court |
    In re Coffield, 96 Ohio App. 3d 52, 644 N.E.2d 662 (1994)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b) 12(2)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the standard required under Articles 13(1)(b) and 12(2) had not been met.

  • 1994 | HC/E/USf 139 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | First Instance |
    Currier v. Currier, 845 F. Supp. 916 (D.N.H. 1994)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Consent - Art. 13(1)(a) | Role of the Central Authorities - Arts 6 - 10 | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the standard required under Articles 13(1)(a) and 13(1)(b) had not been met.

  • 1992 | HC/E/USs 155 | UNITED STATES - STATE JURISDICTION | Appellate Court |
    Tahan v. Duquette, 259 N.J. Super. 328, 613 A.2d 486 (App. Div. 1992)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed, retention wrongful and return ordered; the standard required under Articles 13(1)(b) and 13(2) had not been met.

  • 1999 | HC/E/USf 216 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | Appellate Court |
    Blondin v. Dubois, 189 F.3d 240 (2d Cir. 1999)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Role of the Central Authorities - Arts 6 - 10

    Article(s)

    3 8 9 10 11 12 13(1)(b) 13(2) 16 19 29

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed and case remitted to the District Court to consider remedies that might allow both the return of the children to their habitual residence and their protection from harm pending a custody hearing in France.

  • 1994 | HC/E/AU 231 | AUSTRALIA | First Instance |
    Director General of the Department of Community Services v. N., 19 August 1994, transcript, Family Court of Australia (Sydney)
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the removal was wrongful and neither Article 13(1)(b) nor Article 13(2) had been proven to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 1994 | HC/E/AU 292 | AUSTRALIA | First Instance |
    In the Marriage of S.S. and D.K. Bassi (1994) FLC 92-465, 17 Fam LR 571
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Removal wrongful but return refused; the standard required under Article 13(2) had been met with respect to the older girl's objections and it was consequently held that it would place the younger child in an intolerable situation to be returned alone.

  • 1999 | HC/E/AU 294 | AUSTRALIA | First Instance |
    Director-General Department of Families, Youth and Community Care and Hobbs, 24 September 1999, Family Court of Australia (Brisbane) [1999] FamCA 2059, (2000) FLC 93-007
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Undertakings

    Order

    Return ordered subject to undertakings

    Article(s)

    3 5 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Return ordered subject to undertakings; the removal of the child breached the father's rights of custody and the standard of harm required under Article 13(1)(b) had not been established.