Refine your search

Keyword:

Grounds:

Show more

Year:

Country:

Show more

Article(s):

Show more

Order:

Show more

Requesting State:

Show more

Requested State:

Show more

Court Level:

Show more

Instrument:

Search results (833)

  • 2012 | HC/E/LV 1152 | European Court of Human Rights (ECrtHR) |
    Šneersone and Kampanella v. Italy (Application No 14737/09)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) | Issues Relating to Return | Procedural Matters

    Article(s)

    3 4 6 7 11 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 20 13(3)

    Ruling

    The European Court of Human Rights held by six votes to one that there had been a violation of Article 8 of the ECHR on account of the Italian courts' order for the child to be returned to Italy; and unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 8 on account of the mother's absence from the hearing of the Rome Youth Court. Damages were awarded to mother and child.

  • 2009 | HC/E/CA 1093 | CANADA | First Instance |
    M.P. c. J.K., Droit de la Famille 0957, Cour supérieure de Montréal, 8 janvier 2009, 2009 QCCS 141
    Languages
    Full text download FR
    Summary available in EN | FR
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Consent - Art. 13(1)(a)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    1 3 4 5 13(1)(a)

    Ruling

    Return ordered at the date provided for by the parental agreement.

  • 2009 | HC/E/CA 1094 | CANADA | First Instance |
    J.M. c. C.C., Droit de la Famille 093056, Cour supérieure de Hull, 7 décembre 2009, 2009 QCCS 5812
    Languages
    Full text download FR
    Summary available in EN | FR
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    3 12 13(2)

    Ruling

    Return refused; the removal was wrongful but the children validly objected to their return.

  • 2010 | HC/E/CH 1078 | SWITZERLAND | Superior Appellate Court |
    5A_25/2010, II. zivilrechtliche Abteilung, arrêt du TF du 2 février 2010
    Languages
    Full text download DE
    Summary available in EN | FR
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Procedural Matters

    Article(s)

    3 26

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed in part; the removal was not wrongful, the order denying return was upheld; however, the ruling was amended in that it ordered the father to indemnify the mother.

  • 2011 | HC/E/CA 1023 | CANADA | First Instance |
    TV c. MB, Droit de la famille 111646, 2011 QCCS 2929
    Languages
    Full text download FR
    Summary available in FR
    Grounds

    Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Procedural Matters | Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Consent - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b)

  • 1997 | HC/E/CA 747 | CANADA | Appellate Court |
    Droit de la Famille 2785, No 500-09-005532-973
    Languages
    Full text download FR
    Summary available in FR
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2)

    Order

    Appeal allowed, application dismissed

    Article(s)

    1 3 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 13(3)

  • 1998 | HC/E/CA 756 | CANADA | First Instance |
    Belton v. Belton (1998), 132 Man.R. (2d) 265 (Q.B. (Fam. Div.))
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 4 12 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the retention was wrongful and none of the exceptions had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 2004 | HC/E/PE 874 | PERU | Appellate Court |
    File Nº 14.593-2003
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 12 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the retention was wrongful and none of the exceptions had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 2007 | HC/E/CH 986 | SWITZERLAND | Superior Appellate Court |
    5A.582/2007 Bundesgericht, II. Zivilabteilung, 04 décembre 2007
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in FR
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 12 13(2) 20

  • 2007 | HC/E/UKe 964 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | Appellate Court |
    Nyachowe v. Fielder [2007] EWCA Civ 1129
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(2)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return refused; the retention was wrongful and notwithstanding the child's objections to a return the Court exercised its discretion to make a return order.

  • 2003 | HC/E/CA 912 | CANADA | Appellate Court |
    M.T. c. T.B., Cour d'appel du Québec, 5 décembre 2003, N° 200-09-004648-033 (200-04-011942-032 & 200-04-011658-034)
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in FR
    Grounds

    Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2) | Human Rights - Art. 20

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 20 12(2)

  • 2004 | HC/E/CA 914 | CANADA | Appellate Court |
    M.B.G.A. c. R.V.M., Cour d'appel du Québec, 8 juin 2004, N° 500-09-014099-048 (500-04-034363-037)
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in FR
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2)

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return refused

    Article(s)

    3 12(2)

  • 2003 | HC/E/CA 916 | CANADA | First Instance |
    S.S.-C. c. G.C., Cour supérieure du Québec, 15 août 2003, n° 500-04-033270-035
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in FR
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 12 13(1)(b)

  • 2008 | HC/E/USf 990 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | Appellate Court |
    Vale v. Avila, 538 F.3d 581, (7th Cir. 2008)
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered; retention wrongful and a grave risk had not been established to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 2006 | HC/E/FR 1005 | FRANCE | Appellate Court
    CA Reims, 4 juillet 2006, No de RG 05/02155
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 12

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed and return ordered; the removal was wrongful.  

  • 2006 | HC/E/AU 870 | AUSTRALIA | Appellate Court |
    D.W. & Director-General, Department of Child Safety [2006] FamCA 93, (2006) FLC 93-255; (2006) 34 Fam LR 656
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3

    Order

    Appeal allowed, application dismissed

    Article(s)

    3

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed and application dismissed by a majority ruling; the child was not habitually resident in the United States at the time of the removal.

  • 2003 | HC/E/BE 707 | BELGIUM | Appellate Court |
    N° de rôle : 01-AR-2451, Cour d'appel de Bruxelles, 21 janvier 2003
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in FR
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3

  • 2008 | HC/E/ZA 720 | SOUTH AFRICA | First Instance |
    Central Authority v. B 2009 (1) SA 624 (W)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Undertakings | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2) | Role of the Central Authorities - Arts 6 - 10 | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(a) 12(2) 12(1)

    Ruling

    Return refused; more than a year had elapsed before the commencement of return proceedings and the child was found to be settled in her new environment.

  • 2004 | HC/E/USf 779 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | Appellate Court |
    Sealed Appellant v. Sealed Appellee, 394 F.3d 338 (5th Cir. 2004)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed and return ordered; the trial court had erred in finding that the applicant father was not actually exercising his rights of custody at the time of the removal.

  • 2005 | HC/E/UKe 809 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | Appellate Court |
    Hunter v. Murrow [2005] EWCA Civ 976
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Article 15 Decision or Determination | Rights of Access - Art. 21

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, application dismissed

    Article(s)

    3 15 21

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and application dismissed; the removal was not wrongful for it had not led to the breach of any rights of custody.