Refine your search

Keyword:

Grounds:

Show more

Year:

Country:

Show more

Article(s):

Show more

Order:

Show more

Requesting State:

Show more

Requested State:

Show more

Court Level:

Instrument:

Search results (325)

  • 2013 | HC/E/CA 1575 | CANADA | First Instance
    Borisovs v. Kubiles, 2013 ONCJ 85
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Non-Convention Issues | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Human Rights - Art. 20 | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b) 13(2) 20

    Ruling

    Return Refused.

  • 2014 | HC/E/CA 1573 | CANADA | First Instance
    Aza v. Zagroudnitski, 2014 ONCJ 293
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Non-Convention Issues | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    12 13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Return ordered.

  • 2000 | HC/E/USf 393 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | Appellate Court |
    England v. England, 234 F.3d 268 (5th Cir. 2000)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    12 13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed and return ordered; the retention was wrongful and neither Article 13(1)(b) nor Article 13(2) had been proven to the standard required.

  • 2001 | HC/E/PT 410 | PORTUGAL | First Instance
    Public Attorney v. J.S., Case No. 778/2001
    Languages
    Full text download PT
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    1 3 5 12 13(2) 26

    Ruling

    Return ordered; none of the exceptions had been established to the standard required under the Convention. The Australian authorities were in a position to provide for the well-being of the children, if that was required.

  • 1995 | HC/E/AU 280 | AUSTRALIA | First Instance |
    Emmett and Perry and Director-General Department of Family Services and Aboriginal and Islander Affairs Central Authority and Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia (Intervener)(1996), (1995) FLC 92-645, [1995] FamCA 77
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Human Rights - Art. 20 | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    2 3 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the retention of the children was wrongful and the standard required under the various exceptions raised had not been met.

  • 2001 | HC/E/CH 416 | SWITZERLAND | Appellate Court |
    Decision of the Cour d'appel du canton de Berne, S-359/1/2001, 02/10/2001
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    11 13(1)(b) 13(2) 26

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered; Article 13(1)(b) was not proved to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 2000 | HC/E/CH 435 | SWITZERLAND | Appellate Court |
    Kantonsgericht von Graubünden (Court of Appeal of the Grisons Canton), decision of 6 March 2000, PZ 00 9
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return refused

    Article(s)

    1 3 4 7 9 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 16 26

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return refused; the retention was wrongful but the child objected to a return and was of an appropriate age and maturity to have her views taken into account.

  • 2000 | HC/E/CH 436 | SWITZERLAND | First Instance |
    Bezirksgericht Hinwil (Hinwil District Court), decision of 11 December 2000, U/E/EU000008
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    1 7 10 12 13(1)(b) 13(2) 19 26

    Ruling

    Return refused; the removal had been wrongful, but Article 13(1)(b) had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 2002 | HC/E/SE 444 | SWEDEN | Superior Appellate Court |
    Supreme Administrative Court (Regeringsrätten), decision of 21 January 2002, Case number 7373-2001
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the retention was wrongful and neither Article 13(2) nor any of the other exceptions had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 1992 | HC/E/AT 375 | AUSTRIA | Superior Appellate Court |
    2Ob596/91, Oberster Gerichtshof
    Languages
    Full text download DE
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Article(s)

    1 5 7 12 13(1)(b) 13(2) 20

    Ruling

    Challenge to legality dismissed; the removal was wrongful but Articles 13(1)(b) and 13(2) had been proved to the standard required under the Convention. The return was therefore refused.

  • 1995 | HC/E/UKe 202 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | Appellate Court |
    Re G. (A Minor), 3 October 1995, transcript, Court of Appeal
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Undertakings | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the standard required under Article 13(1)(b) to indicate that the child would face a grave risk of psychological harm had not been met.

  • 1992 | HC/E/UKe 203 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
    S. v. S. (Child Abduction) [1992] 2 FLR 31
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Return refused; the removal was wrongful but on the strength of the child's objection to a return to France, the court exercised its discretion under Article 13(2) not to order her return.

  • 1989 | HC/E/USs 207 | UNITED STATES - STATE JURISDICTION | First Instance |
    Navarro v. Bullock, 15 Fam. L. Rep. (B.N.A.) 1576 (Cal. Super. Ct. 1989)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the retention was wrongful and neither Article 13(1)(b) nor Article 13(2) had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 1997 | HC/E/AU 213 | AUSTRALIA | First Instance |
    Commissioner, Western Australia Police v. Dormann, JP (1997) FLC 92-766
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the removal was wrongful and neither Article 13(1)(b) nor Article 13(2) had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 1990 | HC/E/UKe 163 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | Appellate Court |
    Re S. (A Minor) (Abduction) [1991] 2 FLR 1
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Undertakings | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2)

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return ordered with undertakings offered

    Article(s)

    3 4 5 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 14 15 16 18 12(2)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered with undertakings offered; the removal was wrongful as the child was habitually resident in the United States at the relevant date.

  • 1995 | HC/E/USf 150 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | Appellate Court |
    In re Prevot, 59 F.3d 556 (6th Cir. 1995)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return refused

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed and return refused; the District Court had abused its discretion in declining to invoke its equitable power to hold that the father was disentitled to assert his claim in a United States District Court.

  • 1992 | HC/E/UKe 161 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
    A. v. A. (Child Abduction) [1993] 2 FLR 225
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(a) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Return refused; the removal was wrongful but the standard required under Article 13(1)(a) had been met to indicate that the father had acquiesced.

  • 1990 | HC/E/UKe 162 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
    Re M. (Minors) (Abduction) [1992] 2 FCR 608
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    3 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 19

    Ruling

    Return refused; the removal was wrongful, but the court exercised its discretion under Article 13(2) not to make a return order.

  • 1996 | HC/E/USf 134 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | First Instance |
    In re Interest of Zarate, No. 96 C 50394 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 23, 1996)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 12(2)

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the standard required under Articles 13(1)(b), 13(2) and 12(2) had not been met.

  • 1993 | HC/E/UKe 57 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | Appellate Court |
    Re M. (A Minor) (Abduction: Child's Objections) [1994] 2 FLR 126
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return refused

    Article(s)

    13(2)

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed and return refused; the Court of Appeal declined to order the boy's return on the basis of his objections.