Refine your search

Keyword:

Grounds:

Show more

Year:

Country:

Show more

Article(s):

Show more

Order:

Show more

Requesting State:

Show more

Requested State:

Show more

Court Level:

Show more

Instrument:

Search results (753)

  • 2013 | HC/E/FR 1271 | European Court of Human Rights (ECrtHR) |
    Raw et autres c. France (Requête No 10131/11)
    Languages
    Full text download FR
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) | Procedural Matters

    Article(s)

    1 2 3 4 7 10 11 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 20 13(3)

    Ruling

    By five to two, the ECrtHR held that France had breached Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) owing to its authorities' forbearance of the father's refusal to cooperate in execution of the return judgment. The Court also granted just satisfaction to the mother, her younger son and her daughter under Article 41 of the ECHR.

  • 2013 | HC/E/US 1238 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | Appellate Court |
    West v. Dobrev, 735 F.3d 921 (10th Cir. 2013)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the District Court had not erred in deciding the case on the basis of the pleadings as elucidated by the parties' arguments at the preliminary hearing; the removal was wrongful and the Article 13(1)(b) exception had not been established.

  • 2012 | HC/E/US 1239 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | Appellate Court |
    Khan v. Fatima, 680 F.3d 781 (7th Cir. 2012)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Procedural Matters

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed and case remitted to the District Court; in a majority ruling it was found that the evidentiary hearing before the District Court had been inadequate, in that the trial judge had failed to make findings of fact on key issues and had failed to allow psychological evidence.

  • 2012 | HC/E/ZA 1247 | SOUTH AFRICA | First Instance |
    Central Authority for the Republic of South Africa, E, RC and M, A (11/39798; 2012/1096)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Application dismissed

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 12(2)

    Ruling

    Application dismissed; the child was not habitually resident in Australia at the time of the removal and in any event there had been no breach of actually exercised rights of custody.

  • 2013 | HC/E/US 1206 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | Superior Appellate Court |
    Chafin v. Chafin, 133 S. Ct. 1017, 185 L. Ed. 2d 1 (2013)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Procedural Matters

    Article(s)

    3 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 20 13(3)

    Ruling

    Judgment vacated and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further proceedings; the return of the child to Scotland did not render the case moot; there was a live dispute between the parties over where the child should be raised, and a possibility of effectual relief for the prevailing parent.

  • 2013 | HC/E/FR 1213 | FRANCE | Superior Appellate Court |
    Cass Civ 1ère, 20 mars 2013, No de RG 12-19382
    Languages
    Full text download FR
    Summary available in FR
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b)

  • 2012 | HC/E/FR 1214 | FRANCE | Appellate Court |
    CA Versailles, 2 mai 2012, No de RG 12/00582
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in FR
    Grounds

    Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Consent - Art. 13(1)(a) | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 13(3)

  • 2012 | HC/E/FR 1216 | FRANCE | Appellate Court |
    CA Agen, 20 décembre 2012, No de RG 12/01694
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in FR
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Issues Relating to Return | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 13(3) 29

  • 2013 | HC/E/FR 1220 | FRANCE | Appellate Court |
    CA Paris, 5 juillet 2013, No de RG 13-11740
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR
    Grounds

    Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return refused

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed and return refused; the removal was wrongful but a return to Portugal would expose the child to a grave risk of danger.

  • 2013 | HC/E/LU 1312 | LUXEMBOURG | First Instance |
    Tribunal d'arrondissement de Luxembourg, 20 décembre 2013, Référé No 785/2013
    Languages
    Full text download FR
    Summary available in FR
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    3 12 13(1)(b)

  • 2014 | HC/E/UKe 1289 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
    Re R (A Child) [2014] EWHC 2802 (Fam)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Retention wrongful and return ordered; none of the exceptions had been established.

  • 2010 | HC/E/1290 | ISRAEL | Superior Appellate Court |
    Motion for Leave to Appeal (Family Matters) 5690/10
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2) | Issues Relating to Return

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b) 12(2)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the removal was wrongful and none of the exceptions had been established.

  • 1995 | HC/E/UKe 96 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | Appellate Court |
    Re K. (Abduction: Psychological harm) [1995] 2 FLR 550
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Undertakings | Human Rights - Art. 20

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered with undertakings offered

    Article(s)

    3 12 13(1)(b) 20

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered with undertakings offered; the standard required under Article 13(1)(b) to indicate that the child would face a grave risk of harm had not been met.

  • 1996 | HC/E/USs 100 | UNITED STATES - STATE JURISDICTION | First Instance |
    Caro v. Sher, 296 N.J. Super. 594, 687 A.2d 354 (Ch. Div. 1996)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Human Rights - Art. 20 | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b) 20

    Ruling

    Retention wrongful and return ordered; the standard required under Article 13(1)(b) to indicate that the children would face an intolerable situation had not been met.

  • 1993 | HC/E/UKn 101 | UNITED KINGDOM - NORTHERN IRELAND | First Instance |
    F. v. F., 24 May 1993, transcript, High Court of Northern Ireland
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return ordered with undertakings offered

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the standard required under Articles 13(1)(b) and 13(2) had not been met.

  • 1994 | HC/E/FR 103 | FRANCE | Superior Appellate Court |
    Cass. Civ 1ère 12. 7. 1994, S. c. S.
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Challenge to legality dismissed; the standard required to show the child would face a grave risk of psychological harm under Article 13(1)(b) had been met and the return was therefore refused.

  • 1996 | HC/E/UKe 33 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
    The Ontario Court v. M. and M. (Abduction: Children's Objections) [1997] 1 FLR 475
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Undertakings | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Return refused; the High Court exercised its discretion under Article 13 not to order the return of the children; grave risk of an intolerable situation and objections of the elder child both being established.

  • 1988 | HC/E/UKe 34 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | Appellate Court |
    C. v. C. (Minor: Abduction: Rights of Custody Abroad) [1989] 1 WLR 654
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return ordered subject to undertakings

    Article(s)

    1 3 5 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed and return ordered, subject to undertakings; the standard required under Article 13(1)(b) had not been met and the Court of Appeal ordered the return of the child subject to undertakings by the applicant father.

  • 1996 | HC/E/USf 82 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | Appellate Court |
    Friedrich v. Friedrich, 78 F.3d 1060 (6th Cir. 1996)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the father had been actually exercising his custody rights and the standard required under Article 13(1)(b) had not been met.

  • 1993 | HC/E/AU 113 | AUSTRALIA | Appellate Court |
    Murray v. Director, Family Services (1993) FLC 92-416, [1993] FamCA 103, 16 Fam LR 982
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Issues Relating to Return | Interpretation of the Convention

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    12 13(1)(b) 17

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the standard required under Article 13(1)(b) had not been made out.