Case Law Search

Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Procedural Matters

Appeal allowed, return ordered

Appeal allowed, return ordered; the removal was wrongful and the grave risk of harm envisaged by Art. 13 (1)(b) was not proved.

Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Issues Relating to Return | Procedural Matters

Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

Return ordered

Return ordered; the children objected to a return, but in exercising its subsequent discretion the court found that there was simply so much in dispute and so much that required resolution that the appropriate forum for the substantive custody proceedings was South Africa.

Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

Return ordered

Return ordered: the removal was wrongful, being in breach of actually exercised rights of custody, and none of the exceptions had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.

Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Procedural Matters

Appeal allowed, return ordered

Appeal allowed and return ordered; the court found the father had a right of veto over the removal of the child from the jurisdiction and given that he was exercising his access rights it was ruled that he would have exercised this custodial right had it not been for the unilateral nature of the removal. Consequently the removal of the child was wrongful.

Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

Return ordered

Removal wrongful and return ordered; the child was habitually resident in Israel at the date of the removal and a grave risk of harm under Article 13(1)(b) had not been proved to the standard required under the Convention.

Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Consent - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Procedural Matters

Appeal dismissed, return ordered

Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the removal had been in breach of actually exercised rights of custody and none of the exceptions had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.

Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Consent - Art. 13(1)(a)

Appeal allowed, return ordered

Appeal allowed and return ordered; the removal had breached rights of custody held by the father and the mother had failed to show that the father had consented to the removal.

Habitual Residence - Art. 3

Rights of Custody - Art. 3

Appeal allowed; the decisions on the merits were quashed and the case referred back to the court of first instance for it to rule on the father's application in accordance with the Hague Convention and the principles set down by the Supreme Court in the case at hand. The removal was wrongful under the terms of Article 3.

Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12

Appeal dismissed, return ordered

Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the retention was wrongful, the children still having their habitual residence in Australia on the relevant date.

Habitual Residence - Art. 3

Application dismissed

Application dismissed; the child was not habitually resident in Italy on the date the removal took place.

Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12

Challenge to legality dismissed; at the time the return application was made the retention of the child was not wrongful.

Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3

Return ordered

Return ordered; the retention of the child was wrongful as the child, according to the parents' agreement, was still habitually resident in England, and none of the exceptions had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.

Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3

Return ordered

Return ordered; the removal was wrongful, the child being habitually resident in Spain at the relevant date and the mother having custody.

Habitual Residence - Art. 3

Leave to appeal refused and dismissal of the return application therefore confirmed; the removal was not wrongful since the child still retained his habitual residence in England at that time.

Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Procedural Matters

Appeal allowed, return ordered

Appeal allowed and return ordered; the removal was wrongful and none of the exceptions had been established.

Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

Return ordered

Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Consent - Art. 13(1)(a)

Return ordered

Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

Return ordered