Refine your search

Keyword:

Grounds:

Show more

Year:

Country:

Show more

Article(s):

Show more

Order:

Show more

Requesting State:

Show more

Requested State:

Show more

Court Level:

Show more

Instrument:

Search results (866)

  • 2016 | HC/E/FR 1374 | FRANCE | Superior Appellate Court
    Languages
    Full text download FR
    No summary available
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return refused

    Article(s)

    1 3 5

    Synopsis

    1 child allegedly wrongfully removed at age 11 – Divorced parents – Father national of France and Morocco – Mother national of France – Full custody rights automatically awarded to the mother after the divorce under Moroccan law – Child lived in Morocco until October 2014 – Application for return filed with the Juge aux affaires familiales of France in December 2014 – Return refused – Main issue: Rights of custody – Rights of custody, including in particular the right to determine the child’s place of residence, has to be determined in accordance with the law of the State where the child had his habitual residence immediately before the removal

  • 2016 | HC/E/CH 1442 | SWITZERLAND | Superior Appellate Court
    Languages
    Full text download DE
    Summary available in EN | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Consent - Art. 13(1)(a) | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    1 3 4 5 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b)

    Synopsis

    Two children wrongfully removed at ages nine and seven – Married parents – Shared parental custody – Children lived in Spain until 5 February 2016 – Application for return filed with the courts of Switzerland on 17 February 2016 –Application dismissed – Main issue(s): Habitual residence - is understood to mean the actual centre of the child's life, which is determined by the factual circumstances; Consent - the departure of the spouse does not require any approval by the other; the only thing requiring approval is the change of the children's place of residence abroad; Grave risk - must be interpreted restrictively: meaning a serious danger, initial language and reintegration difficulties typically do not constitute a serious danger.

  • 2018 | HC/E/NL 1616 | PERU | Superior Appellate Court
    Languages
    Full text download ES
    Summary available in ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Best Interests of the Child | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b) 12(2)

  • 2022 | HC/E/JP 1617 | GUATEMALA | Superior Appellate Court
    Languages
    Full text download ES
    Summary available in ES
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Best Interests of the Child | Procedural Matters | Interpretation of the Convention

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return refused

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b) 19

  • 2025 | HC/E/US 1668 | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | First Instance
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Return refused. 

  • 2025 | HC/E/UKe 1676 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2) | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Human Rights - Art. 20 | Issues Relating to Return

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 20 12(2)

    Ruling

    Return refused. The father did not have rights of custody within the meaning of Article 3.