Refine your search

Keyword:

Grounds:

Show more

Year:

Country:

Show more

Article(s):

Show more

Order:

Show more

Requesting State:

Show more

Requested State:

Show more

Court Level:

Show more

Instrument:

Search results (834)

  • 1992 | HC/E/AT 381 | AUSTRIA | Superior Appellate Court |
    1Ob550/92, Oberster Gerichtshof
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Article(s)

    1 2 3 5 12 13(1)(b) 16

    Ruling

    Challenge to legality dismissed; the removal was wrongful and Article 13(1)(b) had not been proved to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 1991 | HC/E/USs 198 | UNITED STATES - STATE JURISDICTION | First Instance |
    D'Assignes v. Escalante, No. BD 051876 (Cal. Super. Ct. Dec. 9, 1991)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Return refused; the removal was wrongful but the standard required under Article 13(1)(b) to indicate that the child would face a grave risk of psychological harm had been met.

  • 1995 | HC/E/UKe 202 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | Appellate Court |
    Re G. (A Minor), 3 October 1995, transcript, Court of Appeal
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Undertakings | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the standard required under Article 13(1)(b) to indicate that the child would face a grave risk of psychological harm had not been met.

  • 1989 | HC/E/USs 207 | UNITED STATES - STATE JURISDICTION | First Instance |
    Navarro v. Bullock, 15 Fam. L. Rep. (B.N.A.) 1576 (Cal. Super. Ct. 1989)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the retention was wrongful and neither Article 13(1)(b) nor Article 13(2) had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 1991 | HC/E/USf 210 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | First Instance
    Collopy v. Christodoulou, No. 90 DR 1138 (D. Colo. May 8, 1991)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2)

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b) 12(2)

    Ruling

    Return refused; the child was now settled in her new environment, per Article 12(2).

  • 1997 | HC/E/AU 213 | AUSTRALIA | First Instance |
    Commissioner, Western Australia Police v. Dormann, JP (1997) FLC 92-766
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the removal was wrongful and neither Article 13(1)(b) nor Article 13(2) had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 1990 | HC/E/UKe 163 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | Appellate Court |
    Re S. (A Minor) (Abduction) [1991] 2 FLR 1
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Undertakings | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2)

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return ordered with undertakings offered

    Article(s)

    3 4 5 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 14 15 16 18 12(2)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered with undertakings offered; the removal was wrongful as the child was habitually resident in the United States at the relevant date.

  • 1995 | HC/E/UKe 170 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
    Re G. (Abduction: Striking Out Application) [1995] 2 FLR 410
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Procedural Matters

    Order

    Application dismissed

    Article(s)

    3 12

    Ruling

    Return application struck out; the applicant had failed to conduct the proceedings with proper diligence and speed.

  • 1990 | HC/E/UKe 175 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
    Re H. (A Minor) (Abduction) [1990] 2 FLR 439
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 8

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the removal of the child was wrongful as the mother was in breach of her own rights of custody.

  • 1997 | HC/E/UKe 176 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
    Re A. (Abduction: Habitual Residence) [1998] 1 FLR 497
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3

    Order

    Application dismissed

    Article(s)

    3

    Ruling

    Return refused; the child was not habitually resident in Greece at the relevant date.

  • 1992 | HC/E/UKe 159 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
    Re O. (A Minor) (Abduction: Habitual Residence) [1993] 2 FLR 594
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Application dismissed

    Article(s)

    3 12

    Ruling

    Application dismissed; the child was habitually resident in England at the relevant date.

  • 1992 | HC/E/UKe 161 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
    A. v. A. (Child Abduction) [1993] 2 FLR 225
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(a) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Return refused; the removal was wrongful but the standard required under Article 13(1)(a) had been met to indicate that the father had acquiesced.

  • 1990 | HC/E/UKe 162 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
    Re M. (Minors) (Abduction) [1992] 2 FCR 608
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    3 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 19

    Ruling

    Return refused; the removal was wrongful, but the court exercised its discretion under Article 13(2) not to make a return order.

  • 1996 | HC/E/US 188 | UNITED KINGDOM - SCOTLAND | First Instance |
    Pirrie v. Sawacki 1997 SLT 1160
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3

    Order

    Article 15 declaration refused

    Article(s)

    3 5 15

    Ruling

    Article 15 declaration refused; no rights of custody had been breached when the children were removed.

  • 2000 | HC/E/UKe 268 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | Superior Appellate Court |
    Re H. (A Minor) (Abduction: Rights of Custody) [2000] 2 AC 291
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Interpretation of the Convention

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 5 8

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the Irish court held rights of custody in respect of the child and the father was allowed to rely on those rights in making a return application under the Convention.

  • 1996 | HC/E/USs 131 | UNITED STATES - STATE JURISDICTION | Appellate Court |
    Harsacky v. Harsacky, 930 S.W.2d 410 (Ky. App. 1996)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return refused

    Article(s)

    3

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return refused; there was no wrongful retention for the girls were not habitually resident in Finland at the relevant date.

  • 1997 | HC/E/AU 232 | AUSTRALIA | First Instance |
    State Central Authority v. Ayob (1997) FLC 92-746, 21 Fam. LR 567
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(a) 18 12(2) 12(1)

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the removal of the child was wrongful, and neither Article 12(2) nor Article 13(1)(a) had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 1998 | HC/E/USs 219 | UNITED STATES - STATE JURISDICTION | First Instance |
    Blattner v. Dietschi, No. 98-2-14708-9 KNT (Wash. Super. Ct. July 29, 1998)
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Interpretation of the Convention

    Order

    Application dismissed

    Article(s)

    3 5

    Ruling

    Application dismissed; the applicant father did not have rights of custody.

  • 1998 | HC/E/USf 225 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | First Instance |
    Toren v. Toren, 26 F. Supp. 2d 240 (D. Mass. 1998)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2)

    Order

    Application dismissed

    Article(s)

    3 12(2)

    Ruling

    Application dismissed; the children were habitually resident in the United States at the relevant date.

  • 1995 | HC/E/NZ 249 | NEW ZEALAND | First Instance |
    F. v. M., 28 July 1995, transcript, District Court of New Zealand at Wellington
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    1 3 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the removal was wrongful as it breached the father's rights of custody. The standard required under Article 13(1)(b) to indicate that the child would face a grave risk of physical harm had not been met.