Refine your search

Keyword:

Grounds:

Show more

Year:

Country:

Show more

Article(s):

Show more

Order:

Show more

Requesting State:

Show more

Requested State:

Show more

Court Level:

Show more

Instrument:

Search results (333)

  • 1995 | HC/E/UKe 170 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
    Re G. (Abduction: Striking Out Application) [1995] 2 FLR 410
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Procedural Matters

    Order

    Application dismissed

    Article(s)

    3 12

    Ruling

    Return application struck out; the applicant had failed to conduct the proceedings with proper diligence and speed.

  • 1992 | HC/E/UKe 159 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
    Re O. (A Minor) (Abduction: Habitual Residence) [1993] 2 FLR 594
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Application dismissed

    Article(s)

    3 12

    Ruling

    Application dismissed; the child was habitually resident in England at the relevant date.

  • 1990 | HC/E/UKe 162 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
    Re M. (Minors) (Abduction) [1992] 2 FCR 608
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    3 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 19

    Ruling

    Return refused; the removal was wrongful, but the court exercised its discretion under Article 13(2) not to make a return order.

  • 1993 | HC/E/IL 242 | ISRAEL | Superior Appellate Court
    L. v. L., 21 June 1993, (Extract from the Jerusalem Post, 16 August 1993) The Supreme Court of Israel, sitting as a Court of Civil Appeals
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a)

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return refused

    Article(s)

    12 13(1)(a)

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed and return refused; the standard required under Article 13(1)(a) to show acquiescence had been met.

  • 1995 | HC/E/NZ 249 | NEW ZEALAND | First Instance |
    F. v. M., 28 July 1995, transcript, District Court of New Zealand at Wellington
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    1 3 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the removal was wrongful as it breached the father's rights of custody. The standard required under Article 13(1)(b) to indicate that the child would face a grave risk of physical harm had not been met.

  • 1994 | HC/E/UKe 20 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | Appellate Court |
    Re M. (Abduction: Undertakings) [1995] 1 FLR 1021
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Undertakings | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Return ordered subject to undertakings

    Article(s)

    12 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Both appeals dismissed and return ordered, subject to undertakings; any application to set aside an order must be made by way of the Court of Appeal.

  • 1992 | HC/E/UKs 27 | UNITED KINGDOM - SCOTLAND | First Instance |
    Whitley v. Whitley 1992 GWD 15-843
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 12 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the standard required under Article 13(1)(b) to indicate that the children would face a grave risk of psychological harm had not been met.

  • 1995 | HC/E/CA 15 | CANADA | Appellate Court |
    Re Medhurst and Markle; Attorney General of Ontario Intervenor, (1995) 26 OR (3d) 178
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Article(s)

    1 2 3 8 12 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    The father's appeal was allowed and the order dismissing his application as an abuse of the process set aside. The mother's cross-appeal was dismissed as the child was found to be habitually resident in Germany immediately prior to her removal. The child was to be returned to Germany, subject to undertakings.

  • 1997 | HC/E/UKe 114 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
    Re O. (Child Abduction: Re-Abduction) [1997] 2 FLR 712
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2

    Article(s)

    1 2 Preamble 12 16

    Ruling

    The court ordered that the girls be returned to Sweden to enable the original Convention proceedings to be completed.

  • 1992 | HC/E/UKe 118 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
    Re R. (Wardship: Child Abduction) (No. 2) [1993] 1 FLR 249
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3

    Order

    Application dismissed

    Article(s)

    3 12

    Ruling

    Application dismissed; the child was not habitually resident in Ontario at the relevant date.

  • 2002 | HC/E/UKs 500 | UNITED KINGDOM - SCOTLAND | Appellate Court |
    M.M v. A.M.R. or M. 2003 SCLR 71
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    12 13(1)(a)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the father's delay in applying under the Convention was found to have been reasonable and was therefore not sufficient to show that he had acquiesced in the retention of the children.

  • 2001 | HC/E/NZ 532 | NEW ZEALAND | Appellate Court |
    B. v. C.
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return refused

    Article(s)

    12 13(2)

    Ruling

    Return refused: Article 13(2) had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 2000 | HC/E/USf 465 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | First Instance |
    Tabacchi v. Harrison, 2000 WL 190576 (N.D.Ill.)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Return ordered subject to undertakings

    Article(s)

    3 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Return ordered with an undertaking required; neither Article 13(1)(a) nor Article 13(1)(b) had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 1993 | HC/E/AT 563 | AUSTRIA | Superior Appellate Court |
    7Ob596/93, Oberster Gerichtshof
    Languages
    Full text download DE
    Summary available in EN | FR
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return refused

    Article(s)

    1 2 3 12 13(1)(b) 19

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return refused; a grave risk of harm had been established to the standard required by Article 13(1)(b).

  • 1992 | HC/E/AT 569 | AUSTRIA | Superior Appellate Court |
    1Ob550/92, Oberster Gerichtshof
    Languages
    Full text download DE
    Summary available in EN | FR
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    1 2 3 5 12 16 19

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the removal breached a right of custody actually exercised by the grandmother.

  • 2010 | HC/E/PE 1321 | PERU | Superior Appellate Court |
    G. M. E. M. c. J. D. D. S. s/ reintegro de hijos
    Languages
    Full text download ES
    Summary available in EN | ES
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Procedural Matters | Consent - Art. 13(1)(a)

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    1 3 4 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed, return ordered.

  • 1999 | HC/E/DE 602 | GERMANY |
    Bundesverfassungsgericht, 2 BvR 420/99, 9 March 1999
    Languages
    Full text download DE
    Summary available in EN | FR
    Grounds

    Human Rights - Art. 20

    Article(s)

    12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 20 13(3) 12(2) 12(1)

    Ruling

    Unanimous: appeal inadmissible; the issues relating to the consistency of the 1980 Convention with the Constitution had been resolved in an earlier case, and admissibility of the appeal was not necessary for the enforcement of fundamental rights.

  • 2002 | HC/E/LU 667 | LUXEMBOURG | Appellate Court |
    Cour d'appel de Luxembourg, 30 octobre 2002, No de rôle 26941
    Languages
    Full text download FR
    Summary available in FR
    Grounds

    Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return refused

    Article(s)

    3 12 13(1)(b)

  • 2006 | HC/E/LU 668 | LUXEMBOURG | Appellate Court |
    Cour d'appel de Luxembourg, 3 mai 2006, No de rôle 30793
    Languages
    Full text download FR
    Summary available in FR
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 12 13(1)(b)

  • 2009 | HC/E/GR 690 | GREECE | First Instance |
    Court of First Instance of Agrinio (Μονομελές Πρωτοδικείο Αγρινίου), decision 340, 31 March 2009
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    1 3 4 11 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 14 13(3) 12(2) 12(1)

    Ruling

    Return refused; the retention was wrongful, being in breach of the mother's rights of custody, but the child had valid objections to a return.