Refine your search

Keyword:

Grounds:

Show more

Year:

Country:

Show more

Article(s):

Show more

Order:

Show more

Requesting State:

Show more

Requested State:

Show more

Court Level:

Show more

Instrument:

Search results (1456)

  • 1991 | HC/E/UKs 190 | UNITED KINGDOM - SCOTLAND | First Instance |
    Re Slamen 1991 GWD 34-2041
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Undertakings

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the standard required under Article 13(1)(b) to indicate that the child would face a grave risk of physical harm or an intolerable situation had not been met.

  • 1995 | HC/E/USs 149 | UNITED STATES - STATE JURISDICTION | First Instance |
    David B. v. Helon O., 164 Misc. 2d 566, 625 N.Y.S.2d 436 (Fam. Ct. 1995)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3

    Order

    Application dismissed

    Article(s)

    3

    Ruling

    Application dismissed; the children were not habitually resident in England at the relevant date.

  • 1994 | HC/E/UKe 19 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
    N. v. N. (Abduction: Article 13 Defence) [1995] 1 FLR 107
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return ordered with undertakings offered

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Retention wrongful and return ordered with undertakings offered; harm, if any existed, would result from unsupervised access with the father, not by the children returning to Australia.

  • 1994 | HC/E/UKe 22 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
    Re K. (Abduction: Child's Objections) [1995] 1 FLR 977, [1995] Fam Law 468
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Consent - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Procedural Matters | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the application under Article 13(1)(b) exception failed. The mother and children were sufficiently protected against harm by measures under the Convention and the laws of the American courts.

  • 1994 | HC/E/UKe 24 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
    Re G. (Abduction: Psychological Harm) [1995] 1 FLR 64, [1995] Fam Law 116
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Return refused; Article 13(1)(b) applied in the mother's favour. The effect of an order returning the children to the United States of America would be a serious deterioration in the mother's condition and the children would be affected accordingly.

  • 1988 | HC/E/UKs 25 | UNITED KINGDOM - SCOTLAND | Appellate Court |
    MacMillan v. MacMillan 1989 SLT 350
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return refused

    Article(s)

    2 3 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return refused; the father's history of depression and alcoholism created a risk to the child serious enough to support a finding under Article 13(1)(b).

  • 1993 | HC/E/UKs 26 | UNITED KINGDOM - SCOTLAND | First Instance |
    McCarthy v. McCarthy [1994] SLT 743
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 12 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the standard required under Article 13(1)(b) to indicate the children would face a grave risk of psychological harm had not been met.

  • 1993 | HC/E/NZ 29 | NEW ZEALAND | First Instance |
    Re J.E. (Child Abduction) [1993] 11 FRNZ 84
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Undertakings

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the standard required under Article 13(1)(b) to indicate that the child would face a grave risk of harm had not been met.

  • 1993 | HC/E/UKs 108 | UNITED KINGDOM - SCOTLAND | Appellate Court |
    Perrin v. Perrin 1994 SC 45
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered with undertakings offered

    Article(s)

    3 15 12(2)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the standard required under Article 12(2) had not been met.

  • 1992 | HC/E/UKe 110 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | Appellate Court |
    Re G. (A Minor) (Enforcement of Access Abroad) [1993] Fam 216
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Rights of Access - Art. 21 | Interpretation of the Convention

    Article(s)

    21

    Ruling

    Application to enforce foreign access order refused; Article 21 was held to create no rights in private law which a parent could directly enforce in respect of a child.

  • 1986 | HC/E/UKs 116 | UNITED KINGDOM - SCOTLAND | First Instance |
    Kilgour v. Kilgour 1987 SC 55
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12

    Order

    Application dismissed

    Article(s)

    3 12

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed as the Convention had not entered into effect between the United Kingdom and Ontario at the relevant date.

  • 1994 | HC/E/UKe 119 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
    Re N. (Child Abduction: Jurisdiction) [1995] Fam 96
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Role of the Central Authorities - Arts 6 - 10

    Article(s)

    7 8 11

    Ruling

    The court granted an order that the child should be restored into the care of the mother if he arrived within the jurisdiction in the immediate future.

  • 1995 | HC/E/UKe 120 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance
    R. v. R. (Residence Order: Child Abduction) [1995] Fam 209, [1995] 3 WLR 425
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Procedural Matters | Interpretation of the Convention

    Article(s)

    3 16 17

    Ruling

    A direction was given that the Spanish Central Authority should be informed of the facts of the case. A further direction was given that the father should be advised of his Convention rights.

  • 1998 | HC/E/USs 123 | UNITED STATES - STATE JURISDICTION | Appellate Court |
    Flores v. Contreras, 981 S.W. 2d 246 (Tex. App. 1998)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the child was habitually resident in Mexico at the moment of the retention.

  • 1995 | HC/E/USf 98 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | Appellate Court |
    Nunez-Escudero v. Tice-Menley, 58 F.3d 374 (8th Cir. 1995)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Interpretation of the Convention

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed; case remitted to the District Court.

  • 1997 | HC/E/USs 99 | UNITED STATES - STATE JURISDICTION | Appellate Court |
    Ciotola v. Fiocca, 86 Ohio Misc. 2d 24, 684 N.E.2d 763 (Ohio Com. Pl. 1997)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Human Rights - Art. 20 | Issues Relating to Return

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 6 8 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 20

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the child's place of habitual residence prior to the wrongful retention was Italy. The standard required under Article 20 had not been met.

  • 1997 | HC/E/USf 105 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | First Instance |
    Wojcik v. Wojcik, 959 F. Supp. 413 (E.D. Mich. 1997)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2)

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    12(2) 12(1)

    Ruling

    Return refused; the District Court ruled that the retention of the children was wrongful but declined to order their return on the grounds that they were now settled in their new environment, eighteen months having elapsed between the retention and the commencement of judicial / administrative proceedings.

  • 1994 | HC/E/USf 84 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | First Instance |
    Wanninger v. Wanninger, 850 F. Supp. 78 (D. Mass. 1994)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(a)

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the actions of the father were insufficient to meet the standard required under Art. 13(1)(a) to show acquiescence.

  • 1993 | HC/E/NZ 89 | NEW ZEALAND | Appellate Court |
    Adams v. Wigfield [1993] 11 FRNZ 270
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Undertakings | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    12 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the standard required under Article 13(1)(b) to indicate that the child would face a grave risk of harm had not been met.

  • 1994 | HC/E/NZ 92 | NEW ZEALAND | Appellate Court |
    Boy v. Boy [1994] 12 FRNZ 517
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Undertakings

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered with undertakings offered

    Article(s)

    12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered, undertakings offered; the standard required under Article 13(1)(b) to indicate that the children would face a grave risk of harm had not been met.