Refine your search

Keyword:

Grounds:

Show more

Year:

Country:

Show more

Article(s):

Show more

Order:

Show more

Requesting State:

Show more

Requested State:

Show more

Court Level:

Show more

Instrument:

Search results (772)

  • 1999 | HC/E/CH 427 | SWITZERLAND | Superior Appellate Court |
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Human Rights - Art. 20

    Article(s)

    1 3 13(1)(b) 19 20 12(1)

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed; the decision of the court of appeal was wrong in law and quashed. The return application was remitted to a lower court for re-hearing.

  • 1998 | HC/E/CH 432 | SWITZERLAND | Appellate Court |
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return refused

    Article(s)

    3 5 11 12 13(1)(b) 16 17 19 26

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return refused; the removal was wrongful, but Article 13(1)(b) had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 2008 | HC/E/FR 958 | FRANCE | Appellate Court
    Languages
    Full text download FR
    Summary available in FR
    Grounds

    Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 12(2)

  • 2008 | HC/E/UKs 996 | UNITED KINGDOM - SCOTLAND | Appellate Court |
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2) | Human Rights - Art. 20 | Issues Relating to Return

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b) 13(2) 20 12(2)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the removal had been wrongful and none of the exceptions had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 2003 | HC/E/UKs 998 | UNITED KINGDOM - SCOTLAND | First Instance |
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Consent - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    13(1)(a) 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Removal wrongful but return refused; a return would expose the child to a grave risk of an intolerable situation.

  • 2006 | HC/E/FR 1010 | FRANCE | Appellate Court
    Languages
    Full text download FR
    Summary available in EN | FR
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return refused

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    The decision at first instance was confirmed and the children's return was refused on the basis of Article 13(1)(b). The ruling should be sent urgently to the Dutch authorities via the French Central Authority, in accordance with Article 11(6) of the Brussels II a Regulation (Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003).

  • 2009 | HC/E/AT 1053 | AUSTRIA | Superior Appellate Court |
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in FR
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    12 13(1)(b)

  • 2010 | HC/E/CH 1060 | SWITZERLAND | Superior Appellate Court |
    Languages
    Full text download DE
    Summary available in EN | FR
    Grounds

    Consent - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Jurisdiction Issues - Art. 16 | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 5 13(1)(b) 16 19 12(2) 26

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed; decision ordering the children's return upheld, having considered with reasonable cause that none of the exceptions was applicable.

  • 2008 | HC/E/MX 1039 | MEXICO | Appellate Court |
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | ES
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2) | Human Rights - Art. 20 | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    1 3 7 13(1)(b) 13(2) 20 12(2) 26

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed and return ordered; the retention had been wrongful and none of the exceptions had been established to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 2006 | HC/E/FR 897 | FRANCE | Appellate Court |
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in FR
    Grounds

    Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return refused

    Article(s)

    3 4 5 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 13(3)

  • 2004 | HC/E/ES 899 | SPAIN | Appellate Court |
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Procedural Matters

    Article(s)

    3 11 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 13(3)

    Ruling

    Removal wrongful and return ordered. However, the subsequent concealment of the child for eight years made enforcement of the original return order impossible.

  • 2008 | HC/E/CA 913 | CANADA | First Instance
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Return ordered with regards to the two younger children subject to undertakings; the removal was wrongful and the standard required under Article 13(1)(b) of the Convention to indicate that the children would face a grave risk of harm had not been met. Application dismissed with regard to the oldest child.

  • 2012 | HC/E/EE 1177 | European Court of Human Rights (ECrtHR) |
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Application that the Estonian courts' decision to return the child to Italy had been in breach of international law and contrary to the practice of the European Court of Human Rights declared inadmissible.

  • 2012 | HC/E/CA 1158 | CANADA | Appellate Court |
    Languages
    Full text download FR
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Consent - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Interpretation of the Convention

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    1 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed, return ordered.

  • 2020 | HC/E/DE 1475 | GERMANY | Appellate Court
    Languages
    Full text download DE | EN
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    The court rejected the application for deferment of enforcement.

  • 2012 | HC/E/FR 1189 | FRANCE | Appellate Court |
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return refused

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed; return refused. The daughters objected to a return that exposed them to a grave risk of danger, whereas no adequate measures had been taken in Belgium.

  • 2019 | HC/E/CH 1445 | SWITZERLAND | Superior Appellate Court
    Languages
    Full text download DE
    Summary available in EN | ES
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b)

    Synopsis

    Two children wrongfully removed at ages nine and four – Nationals of Macedonia – Married parents – Father national of Macedonia – Mother national of Macedonia – Joint parental custody – Children lived in Austria until 28 July 2018 – Application for return filed with the Central Authority of Austria 5 September 2018 – Return ordered – Main issues: Effective exercise of custody and grave risk – Article 3(1)(b) must be read in the light with the Convention's concern that the original condition should be established; there is a presumption that the holder of custody has fulfilled his obligations; the grounds for exclusion are to be interpreted narrowly and only real dangers are to be taken into account in the case of Article 13(1)(b).

  • 2011 | HC/E/FR 1129 | FRANCE | Appellate Court |
    Languages
    Full text download FR
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Jurisdiction Issues - Art. 16 | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 16 19

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed, return ordered. The removal was wrongful and no exception raised was applicable.

  • 2024 | HC/E/DE 1599 | GERMANY | Other
    Languages
    Full text download DE | EN
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Non-Convention Issues | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)

    Order

    Application dismissed

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    The constitutional complaint of the child was not lodged in a permissible way (need to be presented by a guardian-ad-litem). 

    The complaint brought by the mother in her own name was inadmissible as she returned with the child to Ukraine for around 3 weeks. Additionally she did not demonstrate sufficiently a possible violation of basic rights.

  • 2022 | HC/E/DE 1593 | GERMANY | Appellate Court
    Languages
    Full text download DE
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return refused

    Article(s)

    3 12 13(1)(b)

    Synopsis

    One child wrongfully removed at age 1 – National of Ukraine – Married parents – Father national of Ukraine – Mother national of Ukraine – Mother and father have joint custody –Child lived in Ukraine until 02.03.2022 –Application for return filed with the Central Authority/courts (choose!) of [State] on [date] –Return refused – Main issue(s): Art. 13(1)(b) grave risk exception to return  – [Summary of the outcome of the main contentious issue(s) The return of a child to a war zone where it could be exposed to a real threat entails a serious risk of physical or psychological harm being caused to the child.