Refine your search

Keyword:

Grounds:

Show more

Year:

Country:

Show more

Article(s):

Show more

Order:

Show more

Requesting State:

Show more

Requested State:

Show more

Court Level:

Instrument:

Search results (341)

  • 2000 | HC/E/CH 435 | SWITZERLAND | Appellate Court |
    Kantonsgericht von Graubünden (Court of Appeal of the Grisons Canton), decision of 6 March 2000, PZ 00 9
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return refused

    Article(s)

    1 3 4 7 9 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 16 26

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return refused; the retention was wrongful but the child objected to a return and was of an appropriate age and maturity to have her views taken into account.

  • 1999 | HC/E/CH 455 | SWITZERLAND | Superior Appellate Court |
    Case No 5P.262/1999, 11/11/1999, Tribunal fédéral suisse
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 11 12 13(1)(a) 14 20 26 22

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the removal was wrongful and none of the exceptions were established to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 1995 | HC/E/IL 355 | ISRAEL | Appellate Court |
    G. v. G., 14 August 1995, C.A. 5532/93, The Supreme Court of Israel, sitting as a Court of Civil Appeals
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    1 2 3 4 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 20

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed and return ordered; the removal was wrongful as it was in breach of the father's rights of custody, and none of the exceptions had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 1989 | HC/E/USs 207 | UNITED STATES - STATE JURISDICTION | First Instance |
    Navarro v. Bullock, 15 Fam. L. Rep. (B.N.A.) 1576 (Cal. Super. Ct. 1989)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the retention was wrongful and neither Article 13(1)(b) nor Article 13(2) had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 1997 | HC/E/AU 213 | AUSTRALIA | First Instance |
    Commissioner, Western Australia Police v. Dormann, JP (1997) FLC 92-766
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the removal was wrongful and neither Article 13(1)(b) nor Article 13(2) had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 1990 | HC/E/UKe 163 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | Appellate Court |
    Re S. (A Minor) (Abduction) [1991] 2 FLR 1
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Undertakings | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2)

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return ordered with undertakings offered

    Article(s)

    3 4 5 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 14 15 16 18 12(2)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered with undertakings offered; the removal was wrongful as the child was habitually resident in the United States at the relevant date.

  • 1996 | HC/E/UKe 169 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | Appellate Court |
    H. v. H. (Abduction: Acquiescence) [1996] 2 FLR 570
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a)

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return refused

    Article(s)

    13(1)(a)

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed and return refused; the standard required under Article 13(1)(a) to indicate acquiescence to a removal had been met.

  • 1992 | HC/E/UKe 161 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
    A. v. A. (Child Abduction) [1993] 2 FLR 225
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(a) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Return refused; the removal was wrongful but the standard required under Article 13(1)(a) had been met to indicate that the father had acquiesced.

  • 1990 | HC/E/UKe 162 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
    Re M. (Minors) (Abduction) [1992] 2 FCR 608
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    3 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 19

    Ruling

    Return refused; the removal was wrongful, but the court exercised its discretion under Article 13(2) not to make a return order.

  • 1998 | HC/E/UKe 178 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | Appellate Court |
    Re D. (Abduction: Acquiescence) [1998] 2 FLR 335
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return refused

    Article(s)

    13(1)(a)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return refused; the standard required under Article 13(1)(a) had been met to show that the father had acquiesced.

  • 1996 | HC/E/UKe 180 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
    Re S. (Abduction: Children: Separate Representation) [1997] 1 FLR 486
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Procedural Matters

    Article(s)

    13(1)(a)

    Ruling

    It was inappropriate for the children to be represented by either of the parties or by the court welfare officer, therefore they were to be separately represented by their guardian ad litem.

  • 1994 | HC/E/AU 258 | AUSTRALIA | Appellate Court |
    Baxley v. Bull, 12 April 1994, transcript, Full Court of the Family Court of Australia (Perth) [1994] FamCA 31
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Consent - Art. 13(1)(a) | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    13(1)(a)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the retention of the children was wrongful and the standard required under Article 13(1)(a) had not been met to show the father had acquiesced.

  • 1996 | HC/E/USf 134 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | First Instance |
    In re Interest of Zarate, No. 96 C 50394 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 23, 1996)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 12(2)

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the standard required under Articles 13(1)(b), 13(2) and 12(2) had not been met.

  • 1997 | HC/E/AU 232 | AUSTRALIA | First Instance |
    State Central Authority v. Ayob (1997) FLC 92-746, 21 Fam. LR 567
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(a) 18 12(2) 12(1)

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the removal of the child was wrongful, and neither Article 12(2) nor Article 13(1)(a) had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 1993 | HC/E/IL 242 | ISRAEL | Superior Appellate Court
    L. v. L., 21 June 1993, (Extract from the Jerusalem Post, 16 August 1993) The Supreme Court of Israel, sitting as a Court of Civil Appeals
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a)

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return refused

    Article(s)

    12 13(1)(a)

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed and return refused; the standard required under Article 13(1)(a) to show acquiescence had been met.

  • 1995 | HC/E/NZ 249 | NEW ZEALAND | First Instance |
    F. v. M., 28 July 1995, transcript, District Court of New Zealand at Wellington
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    1 3 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Return ordered; the removal was wrongful as it breached the father's rights of custody. The standard required under Article 13(1)(b) to indicate that the child would face a grave risk of physical harm had not been met.

  • 1992 | HC/E/UKe 51 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | Appellate Court |
    Re A. (Minors) (Abduction: Custody Rights) (No. 2) [1993] Fam 1
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return refused

    Article(s)

    13(1)(a)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return refused; the Court of Appeal upheld the exercise of discretion by the trial judge.

  • 1997 | HC/E/UKe 54 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
    Re O. (Abduction: Consent and Acquiescence) [1997] 1 FLR 924
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Consent - Art. 13(1)(a)

    Order

    Application dismissed

    Article(s)

    13(1)(a)

    Ruling

    Application dismissed; the applicant father had voluntarily consented to the removal, therefore it was not wrongful.

  • 1997 | HC/E/UKe 55 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
    Re K. (Abduction: Consent) [1997] 2 FLR 212
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Consent - Art. 13(1)(a) | Procedural Matters

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    13(1)(a)

    Ruling

    Return refused; there had been a wrongful retention but there was sufficient evidence to indicate consent on the part of the applicant father.

  • 2002 | HC/E/UKs 500 | UNITED KINGDOM - SCOTLAND | Appellate Court |
    M.M v. A.M.R. or M. 2003 SCLR 71
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    12 13(1)(a)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the father's delay in applying under the Convention was found to have been reasonable and was therefore not sufficient to show that he had acquiesced in the retention of the children.