Get notifications for newly added cases by subscribing to our notification service.

Latest Decisions

  • Added on: 19 December 2025 | First Instance

    Re Y (Child Abduction; Habitual Residence; Grave Risk; Ukraine) [2025] EWHC 3123 (Fam) | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | HC/E/UKe 1659

    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Return refused. Though the mother was indeed wrongfully retaining the child, by the time the father made an application for return the child was settled in England and habitually resident there. 

  • Added on: 19 December 2025 | First Instance

    Re G and B (Children) (Abduction: Settlement: Grave Risk: Ukraine) [2025] EWHC 795 (Fam) | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | HC/E/UKe 1658

    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b) 12(2)

    Ruling

    Return refused. 

  • Added on: 19 December 2025 | First Instance

    White v. Stover Case No. 3:25-cv-00556 | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | HC/E/US 1657

    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Return ordered.

  • Added on: 19 December 2025 | Appellate Court

    Xamplas v. Xamplas 2025 ME 92 | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | HC/E/US 1656

    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Procedural Matters | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return refused

    Article(s)

    12(2)

    Ruling

    First instance judgment affirmed, appeal denied. The wrongful retention began on 4 January 2023. The father did not successfully file a petition until April 2024 and the child was found to be well-settled in the USA. The lower court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to order the child’s return to Greece. 

  • Added on: 19 December 2025 | Superior Appellate Court

    K. J. O., UNIÃO v. G. S. O., Recurso Especial No. No 2100050 - RS (2023/0352687-0) | BRAZIL | HC/E/BR 1654

    Languages
    Full text download PT
    Summary available in EN | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2) | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b)

    Synopsis

    Wrongful removal of a seven-month-old child – U.S. national – Married parents – Father a U.S. citizen – Mother a Brazilian citizen – Shared rights of custody – Child lived in the United States from birth until May 2021 – Return application submitted to the Central Authority in the United States in September 2021 – Appeal allowed, return ordered – Key issues: habitual residence, rights of custody, settlement of the child, grave risk exception – The child’s habitual residence was in the United States – Custody matters must be resolved by the courts of the State of the child’s habitual residence – The father filed the return application within one year of the wrongful retention – The Court held that the allegations of domestic violence were not substantiated, and that neither the child’s separation from the taking parent nor the immigration obstacles faced by the mother were sufficient to establish the grave risk exception.

  • Added on: 2 December 2025 | Superior Appellate Court

    RIT N°C-808-2024 | CHILE | HC/E/CL 1651

    Languages
    Full text download ES
    Summary available in ES
    Grounds

    Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Jurisdiction Issues - Art. 16 | Best Interests of the Child

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    2 13(1)(b) 13(2)

  • Added on: 1 December 2025 | Appellate Court

    B (Child Abduction: Settlement)[2025] EWCA Civ 1382 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | HC/E/UKe 1650

    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2)

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return refused

    Article(s)

    13(1)(b) 12(2)

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed. Order for return to Portugal set aside. 

  • Added on: 26 November 2025 | First Instance

    Abouelmagd v. Semeniuk 25-CV-04402 (OEM) (RML) | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | HC/E/US 1649

    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Human Rights - Art. 20 | Consent - Art. 13(1)(a)

    Order

    Return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2)

    Ruling

    Return ordered.

  • Added on: 26 November 2025 | Appellate Court

    Winchester v. Winchester Court of Appeals Case No. 25A-DC-1199 | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | HC/E/US 1648

    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Procedural Matters

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return refused

    Ruling

    The court reversed and remanded the case.

  • Added on: 26 November 2025 | First Instance

    Aubert v. Poast No. 3:2024cv00926 | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | HC/E/US 1647

    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Return refused

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(b) 20

    Ruling

    Return refused. Separating the siblings would present a grave risk of psychological harm to both children, within the meaning of Article 13(1)(b).