Refine your search

Keyword:

Grounds:

Show more

Year:

Country:

Show more

Article(s):

Show more

Order:

Show more

Requesting State:

Show more

Requested State:

Show more

Court Level:

Instrument:

Search results (85)

  • 2020 | HC/E/IL 1466 | ISRAEL | Appellate Court
    Family Appeal 10701-04-20 R. v B.R.
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Procedural Matters | Undertakings

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered with undertakings offered

    Article(s)

    3 4 13(1)(b) 14

    Ruling

    The Court dismissed the appeal and ordered the return of the child: the habitual residence of the child was in the United States, the retention was wrongful and none of the exceptions had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 2015 | HC/E/CA 1362 | CANADA - BRITISH COLUMBIA | Appellate Court
    Sampley v. Sampley 2015 BCCA 113
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    No summary available
    Grounds

    Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 4 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 31

    Synopsis

    1 child wrongfully retained at age 2 - Married parents - Father national of the United States of America - Mother national of Canada - Child lived in the United States of America until 2013 - Application for return filed in 2013 - Return ordered - Main issue: Habitual residence, acquiescence and the Art.13(1)(b) grave risk exception to return - The application of the Art. 13(1)(b) exception requires the child’s exposure to a high degree, intensity and frequency of physical or psychological abuse - A return order that does not deliver the child and parent directly to the left-behind parent upon return diminishes the risk of incidents of domestic abuse occurring, while ensuring that the appropriate forum adjudicates the merits of custody and access issues

  • 2013 | HC/E/CL 1318 | CHILE | Superior Appellate Court
    N. R. c. J. M. A. V. s/reintegro de hijo
    Languages
    Full text download ES
    Summary available in EN | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Appeal allowed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    1 3 4 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed, return ordered. The mother's allegation of grave risk was not found to be proved.

  • 2012 | HC/E/RO 1149 | European Court of Human Rights (ECrtHR) |
    Karrer v. Romania (Application No 16965/10)
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR
    Grounds

    Issues Relating to Return | Procedural Matters | Brussels IIa Regulation (Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003)

    Article(s)

    3 4 6 7 11 12 13(1)(b) 20

    Ruling

    The Court unanimously ruled that Romania had breached Article 8 of the ECHR in failing to thoroughly assess the best interests of the child and to give the father the opportunity to present his case. It also awarded the father compensation under Article 41 of the ECHR.

  • 2011 | HC/E/FR 1170 | FRANCE | Appellate Court |
    CA Angers, 1 décembre 2011, No de RG 11/00401
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 4 5 12 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered. The removal was wrongful and none of the exceptions raised applied.