Refine your search

Keyword:

Grounds:

Show more

Year:

Country:

Show more

Article(s):

Show more

Order:

Show more

Requesting State:

Show more

Requested State:

Show more

Court Level:

Instrument:

Search results (343)

  • 2010 | HC/E/CA 1421 | CANADA - ONTARIO | First Instance
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | ES
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Undertakings

    Order

    Return ordered with undertakings offered

    Article(s)

    3 4 5 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 16

    Synopsis

    3 children wrongfully removed at age 7 – Father national of the United Kingdom and Canada – Mother national of the United Kingdom and Canada – Both parents had rights of custody under the law of Scotland – Children lived in the United Kingdom until August 2009 – Application for return filed with the Central Authority of the Scotland on 20 October 2009 – Return ordered – Main issue(s): Rights of custody – Art. 3 – Father had rights of custody under the law of Scotland; there was no court order restricting his rights as a parent – Removal & Retention – Arts 3 and 12 – Children wrongfully removed, in breach of the father’s custody rights and without his consent. The father was exercising his rights despite the child protection investigation – Grave Risk – Art. 13(1)(b) –There is no grave risk. Social service agencies and court in Scotland will protect the children upon their return – Undertakings – Undertakings imposed to assist the return and to protect the children in the transitional period before the court in Scotland takes over. 

  • 2010 | HC/E/NZ 1120 | NEW ZEALAND | First Instance |
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Consent - Art. 13(1)(a) | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Undertakings

    Order

    Return ordered subject to undertakings

    Article(s)

    13(1)(a) 13(1)(b)

    Ruling

    Removal wrongful and return ordered; the Article 13(1)(b) defence had not been proved to the standard required under the Convention.

  • 2012 | HC/E/US 1243 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | Appellate Court |
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Consent - Art. 13(1)(a)

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 13(1)(a)

    Ruling

    Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the retention was wrongful, the child having retained her habitual residence in Mexico and none of the exceptions was applicable.