AFFAIRE

Texte complet non disponible

Nom de l'affaire

Jacquety v Baptista (S.D. N.Y. 2021) 2021 WL 1885263

Référence INCADAT

HC/E/US 1513

Juridiction

Pays

États-Unis d'Amérique

Degré

Première instance

États concernés

État requérant

Maroc

État requis

États-Unis d'Amérique

Décision

Date

11 May 2021

Statut

Définitif

Motifs

Risque grave - art. 13(1)(b)

Décision

Retour refusé

Article(s) de la Convention visé(s)

13(1)(b)

Article(s) de la Convention visé(s) par le dispositif

13(1)(b)

Autres dispositions

-

Jurisprudence | Affaires invoquées

-

Publiée dans

-

RÉSUMÉ

Résumé disponible en EN

Facts

The parents were born and lived in Morocco. The mother was a Spanish and Portuguese national and the father a French national. The couple married in France in 2013 and had one child, born in 2014 in Morocco.

In November 2018 the mother travelled with the child to Switzerland and then to Portugal and on to New York City, where they have remained ever since.

In October 2019 the father filed an application under the 1980 Hague Convention for the return of the child to Morocco.

The mother argued that to return the child to Morocco would put her at grave risk of harm within the scope of Article 13(1)(b).

Ruling

The Court refused to order the return of the child.

Grounds

Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)

The parents gave conflicting evidence and both accused the other of abuse. Neither party introduced corroborating evidence of harm from physical violence, such as pictures, medical records, or police reports. The court found the mother’s account to be more credible than that of the father.

Mental health experts found the mother and daughter to be suffering from PTSD due to domestic violence. One expert added that if the child was returned to Morocco her condition would deteriorate and that she would be at grave risk of harm.

The Court found this to be clear and convincing evidence and refused to order the return of the child.

The court also considered possible protective measures in Morocco or undertakings by the father but found that there were no arrangements that could mitigate the grave risk posed to the child.