Refine your search

Keyword:

Grounds:

Show more

Year:

Country:

Show more

Article(s):

Show more

Order:

Show more

Requesting State:

Show more

Requested State:

Show more

Court Level:

Instrument:

Search results (65)

  • 2008 | HC/E/FR 1056 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
    A. v. B. (Abduction: Declaration) [2008] EWHC 2524 (Fam.), [2009] 1 FLR 1253
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Article 15 Decision or Determination

    Order

    Article 15 declaration granted

    Article(s)

    15

    Ruling

    Article 15 declaration granted; both the English courts and the applicant father held rights of custody in respect of the child at the moment of the child's removal.

  • 2001 | HC/E/CA 951 | GERMANY | First Instance |
    37 F 37177/01, Familiengericht Hildesheim
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR
    Grounds

    Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12

    Order

    Application dismissed

    Article(s)

    3 15

    Ruling

    Application dismissed; the removal was not wrongful.

  • 2012 | HC/E/DE 1358 | CANADA - BRITISH COLUMBIA | Appellate Court
    Johnson v. Jessel, 2012 BCCA 393
    Languages
    Full text download EN
    No summary available
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3

    Order

    Appeal dismissed, return ordered

    Article(s)

    3 5 15

    Synopsis

    2 children wrongfully removed at ages 5 and 6 – Unmarried parents – After separation the mother obtained an ex parte interim order granting her sole custody – Children lived in Canada until July 2011 – Application for return filed with the Central Authority of Germany on 15 June 2012  - British Columbia Supreme Court issued a decision / declaration under Art. 15 of the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention that the removal was wrongful on 9 July 2012 - Return ordered by the German Court of Schleswig on 23 July 2012 – Main issue: rights of custody – While a final determination of custody has yet to be made but custody has been awarded on an interim basis, the court retains rights of custody within the meaning of the Convention – This principle is not affected by the absence of a non-removal clause in an interim order  

  • 1996 | HC/E/DE 573 | GERMANY |
    Bundesverfassungsgericht, 2BvR 1075/96, 15 August 1996
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR
    Grounds

    Human Rights - Art. 20

    Article(s)

    3 5 12 13(1)(b) 14 15 12(2) 12(1)

    Ruling

    Appeal inadmissible for being manifestly unfounded. None of Arts. 3, 12, 13(1)(b) and 14 is inconsistent with the German Constitution, and neither their interpretation nor their application by the Court of Appeal was inconsistent with the Constitution.

  • 2009 | HC/E/AU 1018 | NEW ZEALAND | Appellate Court |
    Fairfax v. Ireton [2009] 3 NZLR 289
    Languages
    No full text available
    Summary available in EN | FR | ES
    Grounds

    Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Article 15 Decision or Determination

    Order

    Article 15 declaration granted

    Article(s)

    3 5 15

    Ruling

    Appeal allowed; article 15 declaration granted.  The applicant father was considered to hold rights of custody under New Zealand law.